- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:40:03 -0400
- To: www-ws@w3.org
Greetings, Last week I published a draft version of a spec I'm calling "RDF Forms"[1]. The intro reads; "The Semantic Web is currently missing two key features of the hypermedia application model which are prevalent on the browser based Web; the ability to declare the intent of a resource to receive data for processing, and the ability to use data as arguments in the client-side construction of a URI. RDF Forms addresses these two needs in a manner similar to how HTML forms addresses them for the current Web." I've also described the Semantic Web as being "read-only" until now, but was reminded of DAML-S. From what I've seen, I'd say that there's some good work in DAML-S, but IMO it would have done far better to conform to Web architecture, rather than Web services architecture. I believe RDF Forms is a far more Web (and REST) friendly mechanism for effecting state changes in the Semantic Web. I'm no DAML-S guru, but from what I can tell, RDF Forms would attempt to improve upon some of the Process stuff (which appears to be the part that maps to WSDL operations?). RDF Forms only needs the HTTP GET and POST operations, so instead of *Process, it uses a Container class which can be used to describe resources as acceptors of data submission via POST. Thanks! [1] http://www.markbaker.ca/2003/05/RDF-Forms/ Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 01:36:30 UTC