why can't describe the semantic of DAML-S by Description Logic

Hi,

There have papers describing the semantic of DAML-S using situation
calculus, Petri net, operational semantics. But since DAML is naturally
described by Description Logic and DAML-S is just ontology for service,
why can't we describe DAML-S by DL?

Any idea?

Thanks!

Liu Shengping
Peking University

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 09:14:14 UTC