- From: Marta Sabou <marta@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 10:06:53 +0200
- To: agarwal@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de
- Cc: www-ws@w3.org
Hi Sudhir, Your observation is right: indeed the congo example is inconsistent with the DAML-S model. This is an effect of a modelling fault in DAML-S, which was earlier posted to this list (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws/2003May/0034.html). Also, there is a paper debating this and other issues of DAML-S: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~marta/papers/essw03_VU.pdf. However, the DAML-S coalition is currently working on fixing this. Cheers, Marta Sudhir Agarwal wrote: > > Hi all, > > i was going through the congo example available at DAML services site. > I have a problem regarding "refersTo". > > According to the profile ontology, property "parameter" has range > "ParameterDescription". Property "refersTo" has domain "ParameterDescription" > and range "&process;#parameter". "Input", "output", "precondition" and > "effect" are sub-properties of "parameter". > > In the process ontology, "input", "output" and "participant" are > sub-properties of "parameter". "precondition" is not a sub-property of > "parameter". > > In congo profile however, i found that the preconditions referring to > preconditions in congo process. I am wondering how a profile precondition can > refer to a process precondition, when profile precondition can only refer to > process parameter and process precondition is not sub-property of process > parameter. > > Thanks for any help. > > Sudhir Agarwal -- Marta Sabou
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 04:06:56 UTC