- From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:56:39 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-ws@w3.org
[Frank McCabe]
This just has to be the world's worst way of indicating equality....
Whatever happened to variables? (I know, but its a rhetorical question)
Because we're analyzing processes as sets of execution traces, we need
a way to say:
For every instance of composite process C,
consisting of subprocesses P1 and P2,
the value of the Output property of the instance of
P1 belonging to C
= the value of the Input property of the instance of
P2 belonging to C.
It appears that there is no way to say this in DAML+OIL, although we'd
be glad to hear of any. Hence we had to make up a nonstandard
notation with meaning to DAML-S processors beyond what a DAML+OIL
processor would infer.
--
-- Drew McDermott
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2003 09:56:40 UTC