- From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:56:39 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-ws@w3.org
[Frank McCabe] This just has to be the world's worst way of indicating equality.... Whatever happened to variables? (I know, but its a rhetorical question) Because we're analyzing processes as sets of execution traces, we need a way to say: For every instance of composite process C, consisting of subprocesses P1 and P2, the value of the Output property of the instance of P1 belonging to C = the value of the Input property of the instance of P2 belonging to C. It appears that there is no way to say this in DAML+OIL, although we'd be glad to hear of any. Hence we had to make up a nonstandard notation with meaning to DAML-S processors beyond what a DAML+OIL processor would infer. -- -- Drew McDermott
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2003 09:56:40 UTC