- From: David Martin <martin@ai.sri.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 22:25:54 -0800
- To: "Efthymiou, Nick" <Nick.Efthymiou@schwab.com>
- CC: "'www-ws@w3.org'" <www-ws@w3.org>
Nick - Thanks again for pointing out that DAML-S 0.7 references an older version of XML Schema. Of course I understand your desire to work with the latest XSD. As I mentioned in a previous e-mail on this list, this version of XML Schema was chosen so as to be consistent with the use of XML Schema in the examples accompanying the last release of DAML+OIL. We had some discussion about this recently, and we decided it's probably not wise to change the version of XSD that's specified in DAML-S 0.7, because there's a danger it might break existing code of various DAML-S users. However, we expect the next release of DAML-S to be based on OWL (so it'll be called OWL-S). With that release, we will certainly employ the latest version of XSD, as you suggest. Regards, David "Efthymiou, Nick" wrote: > Profile.daml contains (line numbers added) > > 748 <!-- A URL to the companies web site --> > 749 <daml:DatatypeProperty rdf:ID="webURL"> > 750 <daml:domain rdf:resource="#Actor"/> > 751 <daml:range rdf:resource="&xsd;#string"/> > 752 </daml:DatatypeProperty> > > Please change line 751 to read: > <daml:range rdf:resource="&xsd;#anyURI"/> > > This assumes that xsd is set to the namespace URI > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema > > Thank you! > > - Nick - > > > WARNING: All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or > > otherwise recorded by the Charles Schwab corporate e-mail system and is > > subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to someone > > other than the recipient. > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:26:35 UTC