- From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:04:56 -0400
- To: "'Jeff Lansing'" <jeff@polexis.com>, www-ws@w3c.org
- Cc: katia@cs.cmu.edu
Jeff, in my lab at CMU, besides publications like the one Terry referred you to, we have an implementation of a DAML-S matchmaker integrated with UDDI. Please check www.cs.cmu.edu/~softagents under Semantic web research, in particular Daml-s matching engine. -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Lansing Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:07 AM To: www-ws@w3c.org Subject: DAML-S and UDDI Hi, Has anyone proposed a mapping for storing DAML-S in a UDDI registry? Or is this just a totally bad idea, that I haven't seen why it is such, yet? My thought was: Hey, if web services is UDDI + SOAP + WSDL (and, implicitly, if you believe the hype, that's all it is), and we know that you can't even begin to figure out what a service does from its WSDL, then why not. Jeff
Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 13:05:35 UTC