- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:30:44 -0400
- To: "Michael Ryan Bannon" <mrbannon@uwaterloo.ca>
- Cc: "Min Tian" <tian@inf.fu-berlin.de>, <www-ws@w3.org>
Hello Min, Michael: I would say that all the Semantic Web Services people have QoS high on their list with some (preliminary) support already sketched in DAML-S. (Wow, did I weasel on that one, it's not merely "support", but *preliminary* support that's merely sketched. Oh well :)) I think SWS folks (well, ok, me) are especially concerned to support derivability of the QoS of a composition from the QoS (and other factors) of its parts. I would also say, but with a bit of hand waving, that supporting complex, extensible notions of QoS is important. Of course, supporting complex, extensible notions of Foo, for any Foo, seems the default position these days :) Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 09:26:43 UTC