- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:58:47 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: www-ws@w3.org
Hi Dan, On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:18:44AM -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: > Regardless of those details, we still have a huge opportunity here for > better characterising the facilities offered by these services. Think of > the number of Web sites (olde style HTML based sites, even) that offer > ZipCode/Postcode based searches, or ISBN-based lookups, or that can be > keyed into by airport codes, stocktickers or other predictable datatypes, > value sets etc. > > My interest is in cataloguing these services, regardless of the mechanics > of interaction with them. I suspect that doing so will help make the case > for careful use of HTTP GET. Once it is easier to find such services (or > 'web sites', as we used to call them) it'll be easier to mechanically > generate links into them, which in turn might encourage deployment of > GETable interfaces. Do you have an example? > ps. do you know any URIs for example services that use the SOAP GET > support? The only one I know of is this; http://soap.4s4c.com/registration/rounds/ http://soap.4s4c.com/registration/tests/ http://soap.4s4c.com/registration/toolkits/ > It'd be interesting to experiment with use of a stylesheet PI in > these, for linking to XSLT-based UI for web services. I understand SOAP > currently discourages this, but I'd still be interested in seeing whether > its a useful technique... I think it would be hugely useful, but the WG already rejected the requests (including mine) to reintroduce PIs for this purpose. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Will distribute objects for food
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 10:55:23 UTC