rpc:signature question.

Assertion WRPC-0053 [1] states:

 

For each pair (q, #in), there MUST be a child element of the input element
with a name of q. There MUST NOT be a child element of the output element
with the name of q.

 

What is "child of the input element" supposed to mean?  The <wsdl:input>
element doesn't have significant children (extensions and documentation).
So it could instead mean an "element declaration in the complexType declared
by the {element declaration} of the Message Reference component with
{direction} 'in'".  Is that the intention?

The assertions immediately following this one also suffer generally from
this malaise.

 

[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html
?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#WRPC-5023

 

Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

 

Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2007 06:01:14 UTC