RE: Canon to canon logs

Lots of green!  Congratulations!

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/results-messages
/Message-tests-results.html


Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 8:23 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: 'Philippe Le Hegaret'; 'www-ws-desc'
> Subject: Re: Canon to canon logs
> 
> Please find new logs (with GuaranteedFault included this time).
> I hope that a few reds will turn green.
> By the way, I noticed that our implementation hopefully handles
> ignoreUncited="true" correctly on the client-side, but is not able to do
> so on the server-side. This should at least trigger reds in
> LocationTemplate-1G and MessageTest-2G.
> Although workarounds are possible, I am quite not sure that we will
> support it.
>     Youenn
> 
> 
> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> > BTW, Canon's results for MessageTest-1G appear to omit the
> GuaranteedFault
> > operation tests, which screws up the analysis after the first dozen
> > testcases or so, as the assertions no longer correspond to the right
> > messages...
> >
> > Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -
> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 7:54 AM
> >> To: Jonathan Marsh
> >> Cc: 'Youenn Fablet'; 'www-ws-desc'
> >> Subject: RE: Canon to canon logs
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:02 -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> >>
> >>> I added a little indirection on the {http location} values.  I created
> a
> >>> little substitution table named httpLocationTable.xml, which simply
> >>>
> >> contains
> >>
> >>> a list of pre-substitution and expected post-substitution values, and
> >>>
> >> does a
> >>
> >>> swap when generating the assertions.
> >>>
> >> Nice one! Is httpLocationTable.xml generated from elsewhere or do you
> >> have to update it by hand?
> >>
> >>
> >>> I also suppressed assertions checking the HTTP method and URL on
> >>>
> >> response
> >>
> >>> messages - if that's not simply an oversight I am misunderstanding
> >>>
> >> something
> >>
> >>> fundamental...
> >>>
> >> Good catch.
> >>
> >> Philippe
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >

Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2007 21:50:50 UTC