RE: The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change?

Jonathan,

I am OK with keeping the namespace as is if that reduces churn.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



"Jonathan Marsh" <jonathan@wso2.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
02/06/2007 02:28 PM

To
"'Jeremy Hughes'" <hughesj@apache.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change?







I had assumed it wouldn't change, yet we should consider this as a WG,
whether the benefit of a more current (and shorter) namespace URI 
outweighs
the cost of changing at this late date (e.g. invalidating in a small but
dramatic way all of our implementation results).

If we do change, we could take advantage of the new short namespace URIs
available from W3C - e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl.

I note the SAWSDL WG is interested in keeping a similar namespace form to
ours.

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - 
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Jeremy Hughes
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:50 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change?
> 
> 
> Hi, I have a recollection that since the spec is CR, the namespace
> http://www.w3.org/2006/01/wsdl won't change through PR and REC. Is
> this right, or will the namespace change again - if so will it change
> at PR, REC or both?
> 
> Many thanks,
> Jeremy