- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:28:56 -0800
- To: "'Jeremy Hughes'" <hughesj@apache.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I had assumed it wouldn't change, yet we should consider this as a WG, whether the benefit of a more current (and shorter) namespace URI outweighs the cost of changing at this late date (e.g. invalidating in a small but dramatic way all of our implementation results). If we do change, we could take advantage of the new short namespace URIs available from W3C - e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl. I note the SAWSDL WG is interested in keeping a similar namespace form to ours. Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Jeremy Hughes > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:50 AM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change? > > > Hi, I have a recollection that since the spec is CR, the namespace > http://www.w3.org/2006/01/wsdl won't change through PR and REC. Is > this right, or will the namespace change again - if so will it change > at PR, REC or both? > > Many thanks, > Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 19:28:37 UTC