W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2006

RE: Please review test bad/InterfaceOperation-2B

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:47:05 -0800
To: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, "'Lawrence Mandel'" <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <012301c71254$70e8db50$3901a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
FTR, I committed this on 11/16.


Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com



From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 1:51 PM
To: Lawrence Mandel
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: Please review test bad/InterfaceOperation-2B



I'll review this. 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 

Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 

11/14/2006 02:19 AM 






Please review test bad/InterfaceOperation-2B




The test bad/InterfaceOperation-2B claims to violate assertion
InterfaceOperation-0035 but I don't think it actually does. I think this
test is showing a possible violation of binding operation names and not
interface operation names. As far as I understand the assertion
InterfaceOperation-0035 it should be caught by schema validation. 

Can someone on the working group please review this test case to ensure it
violates the listed assertion? 

For your reference, the test can be found at


Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 18:47:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:07:03 UTC