- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:51:12 -0500
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF1A81435F.A6734CF8-ON85257230.0076A7C3-85257230.00780B29@ca.ibm.com>
Paul, I like the spirit of this proposal but it seems to me that you are proposing to profile WS-Policy. Wouldn't it be better if the WS-Policy WG defined a simple subset so that simple processors could implement it? This is like SVG Tiny. Maybe we need a WS-Policy Tiny? Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca <paul.downey@bt.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/14/2006 04:39 AM To <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject Generic proposal for enganging MTOM in WSDL 2.0 One of the issues resulting from the removal of Features and Properties from WSDL 2.0 is the loss of the ability to make simple assertions to indicate a feature is engaged. Applying such assertions as first class WSDL extension elements, whilst possible, is unlikely to achieve interoperability in a world dominated by WS-Policy. But supporting the whole of WS-Policy is seen as too high a bar for simple processors whose only use-case is applying simple assertions such as engaging MTOM or Addressing. Proposal: WSDL 2.0 provides an extension attribute which MAY be used to indicate a WS-Policy attachment is "vanilla", only contains a single set of assertions and does not contain any compositors, e.g.: <Policy wsdli:simpleAssertions="true"> <wsoma:OptimizedMimeSerialization /> <wsa:UsingAddressing /> </Policy> A non-Policy aware processor may process the wrapped assertions as just another hop in their XPaths, and yet continue to interoperate with processors which support the whole of WS-Policy. In the case of MTOM, there still needs to be a set of extension elements defined, but there is work in this area, all be it currently outside of a recognised standards body [1]. Paul [1] http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/specification/ws-mtom/
Received on Friday, 24 November 2006 21:51:35 UTC