- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:09:12 +0100
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
The other option in that case is, I guess, to not use a default transfer
coding in the first place. Otherwise your solution sounds good to me.
JJ.
Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>
> I presume omitting the {http transfer coding} property results in no
> content coding being specified. How do I get that behavior if there is
> an {http transfer coding default} in effect?
>
> Namely, is an empty value allowed for whttp:transferCoding and
> whttp:transferCodingDefault?
>
> <binding … whttp:transferCodingDefault="gzip">
>
> <operation … wtthp:transferCodingDefault=””>
>
> A literal read says the value has to be a transfer coding token (which
> doesn’t include an empty string). It’s also not clear whether an
> implementation will attempt to specify an empty transfer coding in
> this case, or whether it will simply ignore the transfer coding
> property completely.
>
> **Jonathan Marsh** - http://www.wso2.com -
> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>
Received on Friday, 17 November 2006 17:10:04 UTC