- From: Lawrence Mandel <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:02:52 -0500
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF6CC4DA10.1754E59B-ON85257226.00681C9A-85257226.0068A1DB@ca.ibm.com>
Of course the previous patch I attached had an error. (Too much manual XML editing :) ) Here's a corrected patch . Lawrence Mandel Software Developer IBM Rational Software Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920 lmandel@ca.ibm.com Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/14/2006 12:31 PM To www-ws-desc@w3.org cc Subject Re: Please review test bad/InterfaceOperation-2B Turns out I misunderstood the test. It was attempting to test the assertion but was structured improperly because it was missing a wsdl:include statement. I've attached a patch with a correction. Lawrence Mandel Software Developer IBM Rational Software Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920 lmandel@ca.ibm.com Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 11/14/2006 02:19 AM To www-ws-desc@w3.org cc Subject Please review test bad/InterfaceOperation-2B The test bad/InterfaceOperation-2B claims to violate assertion InterfaceOperation-0035 but I don't think it actually does. I think this test is showing a possible violation of binding operation names and not interface operation names. As far as I understand the assertion InterfaceOperation-0035 it should be caught by schema validation. Can someone on the working group please review this test case to ensure it violates the listed assertion? For your reference, the test can be found at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/documents/bad/InterfaceOperation-2B Thanks, Lawrence Mandel Software Developer IBM Rational Software Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920 lmandel@ca.ibm.com
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: InterfaceOperation-2B_Correction.patch
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 19:03:21 UTC