- From: Lawrence Mandel <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:53:51 -0500
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFA261B7B4.088E02A8-ON85257226.000D205B-85257226.000FEA9B@ca.ibm.com>
The following assertions do not appear to really be assertions at all. I suggest removing them from the assertions table and removing their assertion identifiers. Description-1201000 WSDL 2.0 definitions are represented in XML by one or more WSDL 2.0 Information Sets (Infosets), that is one or more description element information items. LM: I think this is too broad to be an assertion. Description-1201005 Zero or more element information items amongst its [children], in order as follows: LM: I don't think this statement contains an assertion and if this is an assertion there are many other instances of this statement that should be added to the assertions table. Types-1300002 Specifically components that the schema imports via xs:import are NOT referenceable. LM: This assertion does not use the MUST NOT convention and I think is covered by the other schema import assertions although I think the text is still useful in the WSDL spec. Types-1300003 Similarly, components defined in an inlined XML schema are NOT automatically referenceable within WSDL 2.0 document that imported (using wsdl:import ) the WSDL 2.0 document that inlines the schema (see 4.2 Importing Descriptions for more details). LM: This assertion does not use the MUST NOT convention and I think is covered by the other schema and WSDL import assertions although I think the text is still useful in the WSDL spec. Thanks, Lawrence Mandel Software Developer IBM Rational Software Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920 lmandel@ca.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 02:54:20 UTC