- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:02:50 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
OK, I think I'm done with the MessageTest-* cases now, and checking them in. My hope is that these three testcases are sufficient to minimally exercise the wire-level features of WSDL 2.0 Parts 1 and 2. Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:59 PM > To: 'Youenn Fablet' > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: RE: Test suite work > > > Cool, I've fixed those problems, and added the HTTP extensions in as well > (a > third binding). > > I also added MessageTest-2G, which tests part (but not all) of the HTTP > binding. > > A draft of MessageTest-3G is checked in, to do the rest of the HTTP > binding, > but it's not at all complete yet. > > Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - > http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:45 AM > > To: Jonathan Marsh > > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Test suite work > > > > Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > > > > > I did a fair bit of work on the test suite today, fixing both > > > wsdl-xslt, the rollup, a number of flawed baselines, and removing F&P > > > from the interchange schema and removing F&P-dependent testcases. > > > Sync up before you run a test pass. > > > > > > > > > > > > **Jonathan Marsh** - http://www.wso2.com - > > > http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for all this work. > > I just tried the newest MessageTest-1G test case. > > I am parsing correctly SOAPService.wsdl except for two things: > > - It seems there is a typo in the xsd:import/@namespace uri: > > "http://example.org/messa*t*e-test/xsd" while it should be > > "http://example.org/messa*g*e-test/xsd" > > - The endpoint addresses are not absolute, which is not valid IIRC. > > Something like http://implementation-specific is working > > > > As for the application layer, it does not yet support some of the > > features you included. > > I will try to investigate a little bit more in the coming weeks and hope > > to have something working for the f2f. > > > > Regards, > > Youenn
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:02:38 UTC