Kendall, You say the operation is safe at the <interface> level which is independent of the <binding>, i.e. GET or POST. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 03/22/2006 01:07 PM To Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> cc Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org Subject Re: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > I assumed we were using that. Kendall, are we not? > Hmm. I think we were, but it got dropped at some point. I was confused for a while about whether it was the default for a GET binding, and then we added POST, so I wasn't sure what to do. I'm still not especially sure. :> The operation is safe when bound to GET, obviously, and it's actually also safe when bound to POST, but I don't know if you can say *that* in WSDL. Advice from the WSDL folks would be really helpful on this point. :> Cheers, Kendall
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 18:32:19 UTC