- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:55:50 -0500
- To: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF10C09847.D9138EEC-ON85257138.0077509C-85257138.00787477@ca.ibm.com>
Amy, XMLSchema.xsd defines other simple types and complex types in addition to elements. If a schema refers to any component in the XML schema namespace other than the built-in simple types, then the schema must explicity import the namespace. The summary is: If a WSDL 2.0 document refers to any component (element, simple type, complex type, etc) of the http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema namespace except the built-in simple types, then it MUST import http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 03/20/2006 02:05 PM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject Re: Must XML schema elements by imported in WSDL 2.0? I took this to our schema guru, who is also on the schema WG. He agreed with Arthur and Robert; we need to require an import for use of schema global definitions (element and type, although I don't believe we permit use of type?), but not for use of schema simple types. Amy! On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:58:30 -0500 Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com> wrote: >Roberto, I agree with your proposal. > >I did an experiment with Xerces. Consider the following valid schema, >test1.xsd: > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> ><schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" > targetNamespace="http://www.example.org/test1" > xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/test1"> > > <import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"></import> > > <complexType name="schemaType"> > <sequence> > <element ref="schema"></element> > </sequence> > </complexType> ></schema> > >If I remove the <import> Xerces gives me the following error: > >src-resolve.4.2: Error resolving component 'schema'. It was detected >that 'schema' is in namespace 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema', but >components from this namespace are not referenceable from schema >document 'file:///D:/workspaces/WSD/schematest/test1.xsd'. If this is >the incorrect namespace, perhaps the prefix of 'schema' needs to be >changed. If this is the correct namespace, then an appropriate >'import' tag should be added to >'file:///D:/workspaces/WSD/schematest/test1.xsd'. > >Therefore, to be consistent with XSD, we must require the <import> >when refering to elements. In contrast, the following valid schema >test2.xsd refers to a built-in simple type and there is no <import> > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> ><schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" > targetNamespace="http://www.example.org/test2" > xmlns:tns="http://www.example.org/test2"> > > <complexType name="countType"> > <sequence> > <element name="count" type="int"></element> > </sequence> > </complexType> ></schema> > >Arthur Ryman, >IBM Software Group, Rational Division > >blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ >phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 >assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 >fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 >mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:56:04 UTC