RE: Summary, 27-28 Feb 2006 WS Description FTF

Jonathan, 

I have actually completed my action item during the f2f [1]. 

Cheers,

--umit

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Feb/0066.html 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
> Sent: Wednesday, Mar 01, 2006 12:53 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Summary, 27-28 Feb 2006 WS Description FTF
> 
> -----------------------------
> Monday 2/27
> -----------------------------
> 
> AI review:
> 
> PENDING     2005-07-21: pauld to write a proposal for a working group 
>                         report for requirements for schema evolution
>                         following closure of LC124 
> RETIRED     2005-10-20: Kendall to contact DAWG to ask for 
> contribution 
>                         to test suite, due 2005-10-27. 
> PENDING     2005-01-05: Glen to write an outline for a test 
> service and 
>                         send it to the list. 
> DONE        2006-02-02: Jonathan to close issue 285 in the 
> issues list. 
> PENIDNG     2006-02-02: Bijan to run the partitioning analysis on
> ontology 
> DONE        2006-02-16: Arthur and Tom to do an initial review of the 
>                         WS-Addressing WSDL Binding. 
> DONE        2006-02-16: Arthur to complete assertion assigment. 
> DONE        2006-02-16: Roberto to complete assertion assigment. 
> PENDING     2006-02-16: Glen to complete assertion assigment. 
> DONE (2/28) 2006-02-16: Jonathan to complete assertion assigment. 
> PENDING     2006-02-16: JJM to complete assertion assigment. 
> PENDING     2006-02-16: Amy to complete assertion assigment. 
> PENDING     2006-02-16: Umit to complete assertion assigment. 
> DONE        2006-02-16: Charlton to complete assertion assigment. 
> DONE        2006-02-16: Jonathan to raise the CR issue on behalf of
> SPARQL. 
> DONE        2006-02-16: Jonathan to keep the SPARQL group 
> informed about
>                         this issue. 
> DONE        2006-02-16: Jonathan to forward Hugo's two remaining
> comments 
>                         to SPARQL, ask them for their WSDL and sample 
>                         messages for our test suite.
> 
> 
> Status of deliverables
>   Provided Philippe with data on why WSDL 2.0 implementations are
> lagging.
>   WG should draft a document explaining the benefits of moving to WSDL
> 2.0.
>   Expect to do a heartbeat repub soon
> 
> Issue 107: 
>   RESOLUTION: Closed (obsolete).
> 
> Cover page at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.
>   WG supports cover page as the best of the options.
> 
> Issue CR007: Assertion required for property <constraint>
>   RESOLUTION: Accept Roberto's proposal.
> 
> Issue CR009: SOAP binding: empty SOAP Action
>   RESOLUTION: adopt proposal to add clarification to say quoted empty 
>               string value ("")
> 
> Issue CR010: Type in HTTP binding
>   RESOLUTION: Accepted.
> 
> Issue CR012: Semantics of wsdl:import
>   RESOLUTION: close by accepting the text that is in the 
> editor's draft
> in
>               section 4.2.1 (2nd must in last sentence)
> 
> Issue CR011: CR Comment on WSDL Version 2, part 2: Adjuncts
>   ACTION: Glen to open an issue around WSDL binding component issue
>   HTTP version:
>     RESOLUTION: remove section 6.4 and associated editorial work
>   HTTP headers/simple types:
>     RESOLUTION: we'll reject that particular comment, not make any
> change.
>                 It is not clear what other types Mark thinks are 
>                 appropriate. This is not a general http header
> description 
>                 language.
>   Section 6.6.6 puts all HTTP headers in a WSDL-specific namespace:
>     RESOLUTION: what we identify here is components as opposed to
> header, we
>                 use the restriction of wsdl which says that one
> component 
>                 per http header and we use this restriction 
> to identify
> the 
>                 component with the header name but we do not identify
> the 
>                 header.
>   Transfer Coding useless and potentially harmful
>     RESOLUTION: keep transfer-encoding
>   Cookie warning:
>     RESOLUTION: No action.
>   WebDAV:
>     RESOLUTION: Have extensibility or separate binding, or use a
> different
>                 Language.
>   ACTION: Tony to respond to Mark's comment (issue CR011)
> 
> Issue CR013: Relax IRI style cardinality
>   1) remove minOccurs/maxOccurs
>   2) remove restriction on duplicate element names
>   3) removing the restriction in 6.1.1 (about the element MUST NOT be
> cited ...)
>   4) add some text matching up tokens with data in order
>   5) more tokens than data is a fatal error
>   ACTION: Hugo to write up text that captures the above points by
> tomorrow
>   RESOLUTION: Accept proposal at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Feb/0061.html.
> 
> Issue CR014: Bug in SOAP binding (Section 5.5.2 of Adjuncts)
>   RESOLUTION: Adopt proposed fix.
> 
> Issue CR015: value space of "extends" attribute Info Item [2.2.2.2 WSL
> 2.0
>              Core Language]
>   RESOLUTION: Add in section 2.16 that list means whitespace 
> separated 
>               "things"
> 
> -----------------------------
> Tuesday 2/28
> -----------------------------
> 
> Woden Demo
> 
> WSDL 1.1->2.0 converter
> 
> Assertion reviews
>   Still a few outstanding.  Need to be done soon!
> 
> Issue 281 (Test suite)
>   RESOLUTION: Already fixed.
> 
> I18N:
>   WS-I18N progressing, needs resources
> 
> WS-A WSDL Binding LC review
>   Reviewed Arthur's, Hugo's comments.
>   Jonathan will forward the appropriate ones to WS-Addressing.
> 
> Issue 287: Modularization of the ontology
>   ACTION: Jacek to enumerate all URIs where we should provide RDF
>           representations.
> 
> Issue 288: coordinating with XMLP WG
>   RESOLUTION: Closed, will use URI defined by XMLP WG.
> 
> Repub:
>   Heartbeat pub of all documents soon.
>   ACTION: All editors to prepare drafts to consider for republication.
> Due 
>           03/14.
> 
> No future FTFs scheduled at this point.
> Next week's telcon cancelled - next call on the 16th, to 
> approve refresh
> pubs.
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 14:07:08 UTC