- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:31:58 -0800
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2006 10:30:32 UTC
Folks, I reviewed the assertions in Section 4, Predefined Styles. I did not see any issues. I would like to make an observation, though. This is independent of whether the assertions are accurate/well captured. We decided to allow extension attributes that are not part of the signature for RPC style. I noticed that neither the IRI style nor the multipart style have a similar allowance. I believe we included this allowance to RPC style to put metadata assertions as attributes for the signature. Similar metadata may be useful for the other styles, but I do not have any use cases. --umit ---------------------- Dr. Umit Yalcinalp Architect NetWeaver Industry Standards SAP Labs, LLC Email: umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095 SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/u/36238
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2006 10:30:32 UTC