- From: Tom Jordahl <tjordahl@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 06:42:16 -0800
- To: "Booth, David \(HP Software - Boston\)" <dbooth@hp.com>
- Cc: "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> English prose for this. (Oh, why didn't we listen to Tom Jordahl's > pleas for simplicity? ;) ) Yeah! Why didn't you? Is it too late? :-) -- Tom Jordahl Adobe ColdFusion Team -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:34 PM To: Jonathan Marsh; Jacek Kopecky Cc: Bijan Parsia; WS-Description WG Subject: RE: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping Hmm, well since Jacek is planning on doing the XSLT anyway -- Go Jacek! -- maybe we should see what the resulting XSLT looks like before deciding whether it should become normative. If it ends up being much more complex and messy than the equivalent English prose -- and therefore much more likely to contain bugs -- then I would (sadly) agree. But, gee, if XSLT isn't up to this task, then what is? It would seem like an indictment of XSLT and/or WSDL 2.0 if we have to revert to English prose for this. (Oh, why didn't we listen to Tom Jordahl's pleas for simplicity? ;) ) David Booth
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2006 14:42:44 UTC