Re: Binding, Service, Modularization, Extensibility, and Location assertions

Arthur,

I included updates for component-assertion-table.xml, 
document-assertion-table.xml, and wsdl20.xml. These looked to be the 
source files to update for the assertion tables. Are there other files I 
should have updated?

Lawrence Mandel




Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM
01/09/2006 12:15 PM

To
Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
woden-dev@ws.apache.org, www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Subject
Re: Binding, Service, Modularization, Extensibility, and Location 
assertions





Lawrence,

Thx. I'll review and apply the patch. You only need to include the patches 
for the source specs, e.g. wsdl20.xml, since the other files are 
generated.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
01/06/2006 05:14 PM

To
www-ws-desc@w3.org
cc
woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject
Binding, Service, Modularization, Extensibility, and Location assertions







I've created and attached a patch for the WSDL20 folder that updates 
component-assertion-table.xml, document-assertion-table.xml, and 
wsdl20.xml to include assertions ids and entries in the assertion tables 
for sections 2.9-2.20, 4, 6, 7, and 8 of the WSDL 2.0 specification. I 
broke the assertions down as best I could into document and component 
assertions. When in doubt (there are some assertions that are really for 
service implementations) I marked them as component. It may be better to 
create a new type of assertion table for service implementations. 



Thanks, 

Lawrence Mandel