- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:27:32 -0500
- To: Lawrence Mandel <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: woden-dev@ws.apache.org, www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 17:28:05 UTC
Lawrence, Thx. I'll review and apply the patch. You only need to include the patches for the source specs, e.g. wsdl20.xml, since the other files are generated. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 01/06/2006 05:14 PM To www-ws-desc@w3.org cc woden-dev@ws.apache.org Subject Binding, Service, Modularization, Extensibility, and Location assertions I've created and attached a patch for the WSDL20 folder that updates component-assertion-table.xml, document-assertion-table.xml, and wsdl20.xml to include assertions ids and entries in the assertion tables for sections 2.9-2.20, 4, 6, 7, and 8 of the WSDL 2.0 specification. I broke the assertions down as best I could into document and component assertions. When in doubt (there are some assertions that are really for service implementations) I marked them as component. It may be better to create a new type of assertion table for service implementations. Thanks, Lawrence Mandel
Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 17:28:05 UTC