- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:07:37 -0800
- To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E801C17AF0@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thanks for the review! The WG discussed these as indicated below: ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 7:59 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Review of WS-A WSDL Binding As per my action item, here are my comments on [1]. 1. Section 2 introduces some elements, <wsaw:InterfaceName>, <wsaw:ServiceName> for refering to WSDL Interface, Service, and Endpoint components. The same result could be achieved by using the IRI-reference component designators defined in WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Appendix A. These elements have to refer to WSDL 1.1 constructs as well, this and other reasons (e.g. difficult syntax) we did not have consensus to recommend to the WS-A WG that they should consider component designators. 2. Section 2 also defines the use of embedding WSDL in <wsa:Metadata> which indicates that people think it's useful to embed WSDL in other XML documents. This raises a question about WSDL 2.0. In <include>, <import>, and @wsdlLocation a location is specified. The spec says this location should dereference to a WSDL 2.0 document. Should it also be allowed to derefence to an element in an XML document, e.g. via a fragment id? This is the case for XML Schema. We recall we defined "WSDL 2.0 document" specifically as a <wsdl20:description> element, which should enable fragment ids to work. If you think this is no longer the case we should raise it as an issue. 3. Section 3.1 defines the <wsaw:UsingAddressing> Extension Element. I have a question about terminology. Our spec is inconsistent. Sometimes we say Extensibility element and sometimes Extension element. I suggest we use Extension element and attribute throughout, rather than Extensibility. I think this is purely editorial. I'll make the change if no one objects. Agreed. 4. The XML example 4-1 is wrong since it uses <definition> as the root element. It should use <description> Will forward. 5. Section 4.3 defines the use of <wsa:ReferenceParameters> but does not say how this affects the WSDL 2.0 component model. Does this add a property to Endpoint? Will forward. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-addr-wsdl-20060216/ Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2006 11:10:09 UTC