- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:21:40 -0800
- To: "'Lawrence Mandel'" <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <026601c717f2$93aab070$3401a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
Yes, so far it's by design. Validation is considered successful if, among the identified assertions that have been violated is the one associated with the test case. It's not considered unsuccessful if it identifies additional assertions that have been violated - or multiple instances of violating a single assertion. However, I put that in place without much thought. It would not be hard to flag those results that weren't one-to-one matches with the identified assertion. Whatever makes most sense to Woden at this point. Arthur, what do you think? Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com _____ From: Lawrence Mandel [mailto:lmandel@ca.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:11 PM To: Jonathan Marsh Cc: 'www-ws-desc' Subject: RE: Validation results Jonathan, With your most recent change I see all green on tests such as Binding-3B, even though the test cases indicates that only assertion Binding-0057 should be violated and Woden identifies that assertions Binding-0057 and Binding-0055 have been violated. Is this by design? I would think assertion Binding-0055 should be flagged with a yellow or red marker. Lawrence Mandel Software Developer IBM Rational Software Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920 lmandel@ca.ibm.com "Jonathan Marsh" <jonathan@wso2.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 12/04/2006 01:29 PM To "'Youenn Fablet'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr> cc "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Subject RE: Validation results Good catch, I've fixed it, with more green appearing as a result. Checked in your results too: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/results/Validati on.html Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 8:39 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh; www-ws-desc > Subject: Validation results > > I have regenerated the validation results. > I have noted that the report is not quite accurate with the good > documents. > They are either flagged red or yellow, while they should be either red > or green. > Maybe a small change in the presentation stylesheet would greatly help > improving the overall results ;-) > Jonathan, can you update the CVS canon validation results file with this > one? > Thanks, > Youenn >
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 22:21:45 UTC