RE: LC344#5: clarification needed

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 06:43 +1000, Rogers, Tony wrote:
> The only interpretation I have managed to come up with for this odd
> structure is "any MEP with an initial input message" - implying that
> it is not applicable to MEPs where the first message is out-bound.

MEPs don't have a concept of inbound vs outbound .. they talk about
messages going between different parties. Of course each message is
inbound to someone and outbound from someone else.

> I'm happy to drop the offending bits.

+1.

Sanjiva.

Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2005 00:14:03 UTC