- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:57:49 +0100
- To: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@wso2.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20051116135749.GB16851@w3.org>
* Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com> [2005-11-15 16:24-0500] > I see the same behavior as Sanjiva. Without 'gunk' it looks strange. > > How about just using "OK"? > > Also, I don't "get" the table. The check marks are left justified; > there is GET,DELETE and "..." rows in the "HTTP request with method" > column but not in the third, fourth and fifth. > > Perhaps the following would help > - Remove the table border around the operations (GET/DELETE) and just > put the operations in parenthesis: "Without Message body (GET, etc)", > "With Message Body (POST, etc)". > - Center the "OK" in the middle of the columns (application/xml, > multipart/form-data, etc.) * Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@wso2.com> [2005-11-16 06:13+0600] > Tom Jordahl wrote: > >I see the same behavior as Sanjiva. Without 'gunk' it looks strange. > > > >How about just using "OK"? > > > >Also, I don't "get" the table. The check marks are left justified; > >there is GET,DELETE and "..." rows in the "HTTP request with method" > >column but not in the third, fourth and fifth. > > > >Perhaps the following would help > >- Remove the table border around the operations (GET/DELETE) and just > >put the operations in parenthesis: "Without Message body (GET, etc)", > >"With Message Body (POST, etc)". > >- Center the "OK" in the middle of the columns (application/xml, > >multipart/form-data, etc.) > > I actually don't get the entire table. IMO the original table I drew on > the whiteboard (which Paul pasted a picture of at [1]) was clearer because > it simply says how to construct (or what can go in) the URI vs. payload > for each HTTP operation. I recognize I have a biased view in this case > however! > > Sanjiva. > [1] http://www.flickr.com/photos/psd/47263522 Following your comments, I have reworked the table. Hopefully, this is clearer now. Sanjiva, I tried to reproduce the table from the F2F, but I found it more complex than the one I ended up with. Let me know what you think: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http_sftab Cheers, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 20:57:47 UTC