- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:17:53 -0400
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Tue, 03 May 2005 18:05:20 +0200 Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org> wrote: > Second, discussed in [3], is about action being required in all > WS-Addressing-compliant messages. I believe that the intent of the WSDL > Operation Name Mapping Requirement (ONMR) is that message bodies > identify the operation so we don't need action URI (unless that is the > extension that satisfies the ONMR) because WS-Addressing RECOMMENDS that > the action URI identify an operation input, output or fault. [much snippage] This is just to clarify: the "Operation Name Mapping Requirement" is no longer a requirement in WSDL 2.0. It is now a "best practice." When mentioning the ONMR by name, it might be best to clarify this point (or it might be useful to determine what the new label for this part of the spec will be, and use that). Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:17:59 UTC