- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:02:56 +0100
- To: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Arthur, do the proponents of WSMO also count? I.e. if Bijan (of the OWL-S persuasion) decides to give up and let me (of the WSMO persuasion) give it a try, will IBM object to the result? It'll still be OWL-based and certainly reviewed by the OWL-S people in due course, you needn't worry about that. 8-) Best regards, Jacek On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:11 -0400, Arthur Ryman wrote: > > I reviewed the current lack of forward progress on the RDF mapping > with the IBM expert in Semantic Web to determine our level of interest > in this deliverable. Our position is that this work should be handled > by the proponents of OWL-S. If they do not feel this is a high > priority, then IBM agrees that it should be dropped. > > Arthur Ryman, > Rational Desktop Tools Development > > phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 > assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 > fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 > mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca > intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:03:13 UTC