Re: IBM Interest in the WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping

Arthur, do the proponents of WSMO also count? I.e. if Bijan (of the
OWL-S persuasion) decides to give up and let me (of the WSMO persuasion)
give it a try, will IBM object to the result? It'll still be OWL-based
and certainly reviewed by the OWL-S people in due course, you needn't
worry about that. 8-)

Best regards,


On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:11 -0400, Arthur Ryman wrote:
> I reviewed the current lack of forward progress on the RDF mapping
> with the IBM expert in Semantic Web to determine our level of interest
> in this deliverable. Our position is that this work should be handled
> by the proponents of OWL-S. If they do not feel this is a high
> priority, then IBM agrees that it should be dropped. 
> Arthur Ryman,
> Rational Desktop Tools Development
> phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text:
> intranet:

Received on Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:03:13 UTC