Suggestion to improve an XML syntax tree

• From: John Kaputin <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com>
• Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:57:52 +0000
• To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
• Message-ID: <OF892FC86E.A733E7F5-ON80257037.003B9B87-80257037.003C378F@uk.ibm.com>

At the start of Part 1: Section 3 'Types' is the following XML syntax tree:

<description>
  <types>
    <documentation />*
    [extension elements]*
  </types>
</description>

In the WSDL 2.0 Primer, Section 2.3 'More on Message Types', the following
more descriptive XML syntax tree is used:

<description>
<types>
<documentation />?
<xs:import namespace="xs:anyURI" schemaLocation= "xs:anyURI"?/>*
<xs:schema targetNamespace="xs:anyURI" />*

[extension elements]*
</types>
</description>

Perhaps Part 1: Section 3 'Types' should use the same XML syntax tree
that's used in the Primer, especially as it goes on to discuss <xs:import>
and <xs:schema>.

regards,
John Kaputin

Received on Monday, 11 July 2005 06:04:49 UTC