- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:51:36 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Logistics [1] and dial-in details [2]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/Logistics-2005-04-21.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0023.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday 21 April
------------------------------------------------------------------
08:00 Check-in and vehicle registration
09:00 Opening formalities
a. Introductions & logistics
b. Assign scribes:
Youenn Fablet, Umit Yalcinalp, Jean-Jacques Moreau,
Rebecca Bergersen, Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky,
Charlton Barreto, Arthur Ryman, Asir Vedamuthu, Amy Lewis
c. Action Item [3] Review:
?* 2004-11-09: DaveO will recast the @compatibleWith proposal
using an extension namespace. (LC54),
due 2005-04-13.
?* 2004-11-10: Glen will post an e-mail describing the compromise
proposal on formal objections, due 2005-04-11.
?* 2004-11-10: Sanjiva will write up this proposal and email it
to the list as a response to the objection,
due 2005-04-20.
?* 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the test suite for
the purpose of interoperability testing,
due 2005-04-13.
?* 2004-12-03: Glen and Asir to help craft the specfic text for
the editors (LC18), due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-03-10: Bijan will look at item Editors to move App C to
RDF Mapping spec to see if it is still relavant,
due 2005-04-13.
?* 2005-03-24: Roberto to draft proposal to split HTTP binding
into 3 bindings, due 2005-04-20.
?* 2005-03-31: Paul to raise issue for extensibility/versioning
for wsdl using schema 1.0, due 2005-04-13.
? 2005-03-31: Marsh to take on (or recommend closing) Bijan's AI
to produce a component/property table via XSLT,
due 2005-04-28.
?* 2005-03-31: Kevin to fix editorial POST/GET and safety edits,
due 2005-04-13.
DONE 2005-04-14: Marsh to put RDF mapping on the agenda for next
week, due 2005-04-15.
?* 2005-04-14: Arthur to evaluate text from Amy on
schemaLocation, due 2005-04-21.
?* 2005-04-14: DaveO to summarize LC77a options, due 2005-04-21.
?* 2005-04-14: Arthur to present a new proposal for LC99,
due 2005-04-21.
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
09:30 Primer [4] next steps
[4]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.ht
ml
09:45 WSDL Schedule
- Dependency from WS-Addressing
- Dependency from WS-Chor
- Repub to sync with Primer?
- Raise issue on namespace document (RDDL)? [5]
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0086.html
10:00 RDF Mapping update (if applicable)
10:05 Common schema structures [6] (PaulD)
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0025.html
10:15 Media Type Description Note
- Issues [7]
- Larry's response to Issue 268 [8]
- Joe Fialli has three comments [9]
- I18N re-review [10]
- Pub plan?
[7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0063.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0017.html
[10]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2005Mar/0015.html
10:40 Break
11:00 Issue LC74a: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (a) [11]
- URI vs. IRI
- Proposal [12]
- xs:anyURI issue? (Asir) [13]
- Amended proposal (Jonathan) [14]
[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74a
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0044.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0054.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0057.html
11:15 RPC issues
- Issue LC75g: RPC should allow element wildcards [15]
+ Proposal (Roberto) [16]
- Issue LC75f: RPC Allow extension attributes on RPC local element
children [17]
- Issue LC118: New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix) [18]
[15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75g
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0038.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75f
[18] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC118
12:00 Lunch
13:00 Import issues
- Issue LC120: Contradictions regarding transitivity of
wsdl:import [19]
+ Thread [20]
- Issue LC89m: Clarify "directly include" [21]
- Issue LC96: wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import [22]
- Arthur's import test cases [23]
- Issue LC74: Idle question [24]
- Issue LC75w: Allow non-dereferencable includes [25]
- Issue LC116: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing
Inline Schemas? [26]
- Issue LC59d: Clarify wsdlLocation [27]
[19] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC120
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0059.html
[21] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89m
[22] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC96
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0028.html
[24] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74
[25] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75w
[26] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC116
[27] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC59d
15:00 Break
15:20 Component issues
- Issue LC99: Message Reference Component is Underspecified [28]
+ Proposal (Arthur) [29]
- Issue LC80: Extension Components are not Described [30]
+ Proposal (Arthur) [31]
- Issue LC59e: Clarify serialization [32]
- Issue LC75m: Inconsistent value for {operation reference} [33]
- Issue LC89f: Strengthen conformance re: syntax [34]
[28] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC99
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0115.html
[30] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC80
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0056.html
[32] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC59e
[33] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75m
[34] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89f
17:30 Adjourn
------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday 22 April
------------------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue [40]
- Awaiting DaveO's further action to cast @compatibleWith as an
extension
[40] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC54
09:30 HTTP
- Issue LC77a: Namespaced elements and urlformencoded [41]
+ "Serialization as 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' does
not ... explain how namespaced elements are to be serialized."
+ Option 1: Status quo (broken?) (DaveO) [42]
+ Option 2: Ignore namespace prefix (DaveO) [42]
+ Option 3: Serialize QName (DaveO) [42]
+ Option 4: Disallow qualified elements (Asir) [43]
+ Option 5: Serialize namespace names (Hugo) [44]
+ Other options from DaveO (TBD)
- Issue LC110: WSDL 2.0 Part3, Sec. 3.4 [45]
[41] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77a
[42] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0005.html
[43] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0032.html
[44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0050.html
[45] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC110
10:30 Break
10:50 MEP issues
- Issue LC76a: MEPs should support addressing mechanism [46]
- Issue LC76b: Define "propogate" [47]
- Issue LC79: Make sure in-only mep is supported in wsdl
soap12 binding [48]
- Issue LC102: What is the SOAP MEP for In-only [49]
- Issue LC114: In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"] [50]
[46] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76a
[47] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76b
[48] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC79
[49] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC102
[50] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC114
12:00 Lunch
13:00 F&P issues
- Issue LC59f: Support compositors [51]
- Issue LC89d: Disabling a feature on a specific operation [52]
- Issue LC89e: Properties are runtime and shouldn't be in WSDL [53]
[51] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC59f
[52] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89d
[53] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89e
15:00 Break
15:20 Schema-related issues
- Issue LC62a: issues with wsdl:endpoint@address (a) [54]
- Issue LC89a: Clarify schema validity conformance requirement [55]
- Issue LC89h: Use XML Schema, not pseudo-schema [56]
- Issue LC100: The WSDL 2.0 XSD for Root Element is Too Loose [57]
- Issue LC117: Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault=
"qualified" prevents restriction [58]
[54] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC62a
[55] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89a
[56] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89h
[57] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC100
[58] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC117
16:30 Quick survey of remaining issues [59]
- Issue LC52c: Last call review comments (c)
- Issue LC61c: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (c)
- Issue LC62b: issues with wsdl:endpoint@address (b)
- Issue LC64: URI References for Schema Components
- Issue LC71: default interface/operation/@pattern
- Issue LC72: Faults that are not described in WSDL?
- Issue LC74b: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (b)
- Issue LC74c: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (c)
- Issue LC75c: Remove {safety} property
- Issue LC75d: Require explicit type for each input/output?
- Issue LC75j: {safety} has a default, @safety doesn't
- Issue LC75o: Remove "if any" from Table 2-13
- Issue LC75p: Make address a binding-specific extension
- Issue LC75x: Complete or remove App D
- Issue LC82: Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug
- Issue LC84c: Operation Name Mapping Requirement doesn't go
far enough
- Issue LC89j: Use namespaces to avoid local-name conflicts
- Issue LC90: XML Schema comment on WSDL 2.0
- Issue LC98: {soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding
- Issue LC101: message level binding?
[59]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html?view=normal&exper
t=1&editorial=1&stateAgreed=1&stateDeclined=1&stateSubsumed=1
17:30 Adjourn
Received on Friday, 15 April 2005 19:52:06 UTC