Re: Example of Z Notation in WSDL 2.0 Component Model Spec

Amy et all,

I printed the HTML example as PDF and posted it to the archive so that 
folks can see the example. [1]

[1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Sep/0034.html

Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/



Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
09/29/2004 01:54 PM

To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject
Re: Example of Z Notation in WSDL 2.0 Component Model Spec







On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:45:38 -0400
Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> appearance, not to resolve the browser dependency. Have you got IE
> handy?

Neither IE nor an OS that it's available for, no.  Is the IE version
standards-compliant, running as it does on a W3C website?

(I just had this argument with IT, so I'm mildly short-tempered on the
subject)

Interestingly, the HTML version seems to work for me, but not for Roberto
(I'm running Firefox 0.9.3 on Debian Linux)

Overall, though, I have to say that if this is one of the issues to face
with regard to the publication of this notation, I am tending toward
disfavor.  "You must use a standards-compliant browser in order to read
this specification" may be acceptable for a W3C spec, but anything else
isn't ("must install a plugin," "must use a browser with known bugs that
this presentation tickles," "must use this proprietary presentation
technology").

Apart from that, I only vaguely recognize the notation (or am mistaking
the symbols for those I recall, vaguely, from symbolic logic all those
years ago), so it seems worthwhile to me only if it is relatively
effortless.

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com