- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 05:03:12 +0100
- To: "'Amelia A Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
>-----Original Message----- >From: Amelia A Lewis [mailto:alewis@tibco.com] >Sent: Wednesday, Nov 24, 2004 19:42 PM >To: Yalcinalp, Umit >Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org >Subject: Re: Minutes of MEP Task Force 2004-11-23 > > >On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:26:37 +0100 >"Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> wrote: >> Are you suggesting that we allow utilization of WSA with the >> additional third-party in-out MEP ONLY (if we were to provide it in >> the note) or assume that its also possible to use it with the in-out >> MEP? > >I would suggest that best practice is: > >If WS-A or WSMD is used with the current in-out MEP, the service is >expressing an expectation that the out message is being routed to the >node-originator of the in message. > >If WS-A or WSMD is used with the third-party MEP (not currently in the >spec), the service is expressing an expectation that the out >message MAY >be routed to a node which is not the node-originator of the in message. > >> I am just trying to find out everyone's expectations here, since I >> missed the last concall. > >Did that clarify any? Plenty. I was not clear whether restricting the usage addressing with in-out was implied and it is not. Happy Turkeys, > >Amy! >-- --umit
Received on Thursday, 25 November 2004 04:03:47 UTC