- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 15:50:46 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004May/0005.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Jeff Mischkinsky, Glen Daniels, Roberto Chinnici, Amy Lewis,
Erik Ackerman, Adi Sakala, Arthur Ryman
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- May 6th [.1]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/att-0035/minutes
-2004-05-06.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
? 2004-01-28: Philippe and JMarsh will look at the ipr for
test suite.
DONE [.2] 2004-02-12: DaveO to produce a refined proposal for Asynch
HTTP binding addressing the concerns of folks
that object to leaving replyTo info out of WSDL.
? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
DONE [.3] 2004-04-29: Arthur to write up concerns about XML 1.1
implications on WSDL 2.0 for potential
forwarding to XML WG.
? 2004-04-29: Umit to work with Anish to create a working
draft on media types ready for our May F2F
meeting in NYC.
? 2004-04-29: Part 1 editors to adopt Jacek's "purpose of the
binding" text, without "interchangeable"
endpoints, and using "confidentiality" (or
similar) instead of TLS.
? 2004-05-06: JJM to incorporate this proposal (SOAP 1.2
Binding) after removing parts that are relevant
to media type and intermediary
DONE 2004-05-06: Marsh to draft David O or Hugo to write up a
proposal for describing the requirement &
capabilities bucket of http features
? 2004-05-06: Part 3 editors to incorporate Sanjiva's @value
proposal.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0029.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0032.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Non-renewing members:
- Mike Davoren (W. W. Grainger)
- Mike McHugh (W. W. Grainger)
- Dan Kulp (IONA)
- Michael Mealling (Verisign)
- Mike Ballantyne (EDS)
- Waqar Sadiq (EDS)
b. Upcoming FTFs
- May 19, 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
May 20, 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
1:30 PM - 3:30 PM testing task force meeting?
May 21, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM
Hosted by IBM in NYC [.1], registration open [.2]
(Sorry, no draft agenda yet).
- August 2-4 (London)
Logistics [.3], registration [.4].
- September 14-16 (Toronto) [.5]
c. Review of I18N WS Task Force documents [.6]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-05-f2f.htm
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/WSD0405/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-08-f2f.htm
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Mar/0064.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004May/0000.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0034.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Task Force Status.
a. Media type description
- Draft of first WD for WG approval by May FTF.
b. QA & Testing
- Suggested QA plan [.1]
- More details from Arthur [.2]
c. Schema versioning
- Waiting to hear back from Schema on my draft "charter."
- Henry's validate-twice write-up [.3]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/att-0029/QA_Oper
ational_Checklist.htm
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0037.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0019.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues. Issues list [.1].
- Track operation safety (TAG) [.2]
- Normative dependence on XML Schema 1.0 precludes XML 1.1 (JJM) [.3]
- Can a WSDL 2.0 XML 1.1 document contain (or reference), a XML Schema
1.0 type description? [.3]
- Is it valid for a XML 1.1 document to import or include a XML 1.0
document (and vice versa)? (Paul) [.4]
- Tie WSDL conformance to XML conformance? (Arthur) [.5]
- Convert nested subcodes into a flat list (attribute) (Paul) [.6]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0028.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0011.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0012.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0032.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0022.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue 54: Allow binding to any HTTP method [.1]
- Hugo's original proposal [.2]
- DaveO's original proposal [.3]
- Hugo's combined proposal [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x54
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0042.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0055.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0093.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. HTTP [optimization] properties [.1]:
- Summary:
+ HTTP Version
+ Content coding
+ Transfer Codings (Chunked encoding)
+ Caching (Vary, etc.)
+ Content Negotiation ?
- David's original analysis [.2]
- David Content coding is more than optimization [.3]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0019.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0083.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0027.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. HTTP [client requirements] properties [.1]:
- Summary:
+ Authentication (and related parameters)
+ SSL
+ Cookies
+ Content Negotiation ?
- David's original analysis [.2]
- David's initial proposal [.3]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0020.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0083.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0030.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. XML 1.1 issues (see new issues)
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTTP Features - Scheduled for future telcons, dependent on overall
review of HTTP features.
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue 165: Adding HTTPS support [.1]
- Still debating whether to put a specific marker in the binding
re: https (probably delay this; group with other HTTP features.)
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x165
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue 147: HTTP binding uses static content-type header [.1]
- "... we can today describe operations using messages
consisting in XHTML or SVG documents. Using the HTTP binding,
these messages will have the "application/xml" mime type
while it would be more appropriate to use more precise mime
types ("application/xhtml+xml" or "image/svg+xml" for
instance). Therefore, it might be good to be able to set the
mime type to use for a given message, at least at the HTTP
binding level ..."
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x147
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 55: Define binding to HTTP headers [.1]
- Do we want such capability?
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x55
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue 56: Define means to specify an authentication requirement [.1]
- attempt to clarify commentor's intent
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x56
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0033.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue 164: Support for HTTP chunking and other HTTP options [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x164
------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled for future telcons
------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Effort to simplify our spec.
- DavidB [.1] and Jonathan [.2] have provided some data points.
- Arthur's suggestion [.3]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0162.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0006.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0028.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 18:51:02 UTC