- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:58:54 +0100
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I applaud the elegance of this proposal. 8-) I hope it will be accepted. Jacek On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 18:55, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > Issues 146 [.1] and 150 [.2] were inadvertently left off the FTF agenda. > Sorry my bad. Here's a simple proposal for addressing these issues, > assuming we find merit in adding this functionality. > > Issue 146 Should WSDL be able to describe an operation with *anything* > in the message? [.1] > > Issue 150 Indicating empty bodies [.2] > > When using XML SchemaS, The element attribute points to a QName of a > GED, preventing either empty bodies, or unconstrained content. Special > values of the element attribute could indicate these conditions. > > Status quo: > <xs:attribute name="element" type="xs:QName" use="optional" /> > > Proposal: > <xs:attribute name="element" type="elementReference" use="optional" /> > > <xs:simpleType name="elementReference"> > <xs:union> > <xs:simpleType memberTypes="xs:QName"> > <xs:restriction base="xs:token"> > <xs:enumeration value="#any"/> > <xs:enumeration value="#empty"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:simpleType> > </xs:union> > </xs:simpleType> > > (I hope I have got that syntax right. Should be enough to spark > discussion anyway...) > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x146 > [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x150 >
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 09:58:59 UTC