- From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 16:50:48 -0700
- To: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On > > Redundancy is *bad*. Specifying interface twice is *bad*. If it's > going to happen at all, error-handling MUST be specified in sufficient > detail that two processors faced with the same description report the > same thing. I don't disagree with your other points, but want to point out that there is a proposal on the table to eliminate the specification of an interface (was portType) on the binding to eliminate the redundancy between the service/@interface and binding/@interface. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0046.html --Jeff
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 19:50:53 UTC