RE: /service/@targetResource ?

Wow, my understanding suddenly disappeared.  I thought the @role was used
for specifying an endpoint.  Should @role now mean service?

This is a very fascinating point, about whether roles mean endpoints,
services, or targetResources.

Cheers,
Dave
  -----Original Message-----
  From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:45 PM
  To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
  Subject: RE: /service/@targetResource ?



  Jeff,

  I think @targetResource is similar in concept to the ultimate receiver in
the SOAP processing model. However, the ultimate receiver might still be a
piece of the processing machinery as opposed to identifying the resource
associated with the service.

  Arthur Ryman,



       "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
        Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
        05/19/2003 09:11 PM


                To:        "Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, Arthur
Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
                cc:
                Subject:        RE: /service/@targetResource ?




  Does the value of wsdl:definitions/wsdl:service/@targetResource relate to
the SOAP 1.2 @role?