RE: /service/@targetResource ?

• From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 09:15:07 -0700
• To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB8EFDA6B@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.micr>

> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> 
> Is it the intended semantics that two services with the same value of
> @targetResource (or whatever it ends up being called) with ports of
the
> same interface, a client may use either of the service to reach the
same
> thing?

Yes, where "same thing" was the problematic bit to define; as an
improvement over "semantically equivalent" wording in WSDL 1.1, we used
the "resource" wording proposed by IBM\Arthur.

> If not, someone please describe the semantics.
> 
> If yes, we're basically splitting the old service construct into a
> number of the new service constructs limited to one interface each,
> linked together by the value of the new attribute, right?

That's my understanding.

Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:17:02 UTC