- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:06:11 +0600
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> writes: > > BEA strongly believes that this decision shouldn't be revisited, or it > should be re-affirmed. The right decision was made at the F2F, and I'm not > sure what new information is available. This raises an interesting process question for me- as far as I can tell there is no new information now from the time we made the decisions that are currently spec'ed. So should we be discussing it etc. etc.? Some people don't like it, but if we don't have some process then its a waste of time going to the F2Fs as those decisions are likely to be much more contentious in the wider group as F2F has like 10-20 people and this list has a lot. So if we re-open everything clearly its non-productive to go to the F2F. Sanjiva.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 08:06:06 UTC