- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:06:49 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <016101c33c16$18b57c80$7106a8c0@beasys.com>
From the minutes, I observe: <sanjiva> Q1: Should WSDL retain the information whether different endpoints are related or not? <sanjiva> Glenn: @ F2F we decided yes <sanjiva> Jack: we would reject the idea of indicating relations b'ween services until someone comes up with a definition of that relation and then we'd reconsider. <sdl-scribe> JM: out of time, can't reach decision BEA strongly believes that this decision shouldn't be revisited, or it should be re-affirmed. The right decision was made at the F2F, and I'm not sure what new information is available. BTW, an analogy to Jack's request would be saying that we can't talk about the equivalence of URIs until somebody defines what that equivalence means across the entire web. Well, it turns out that the equivalence relationship between resources is defined by the URI owner and we don't need a global definition of what equivalence means to properly get equivalence testing. See the difference between equivalence testing and equivalence meaning? It's up to the URI owner to make sure that it hands out URIs that are equivalent if it wants other software to do equivalence. In the case of WSDL, if a service provider wants to tell clients that services are equivalent, we don't need to define that equivalence relationship for every web service. Leave it to the service provider. And did I really see that targetResource got dropped? Wow, that was a bit of a surprise. Is this what is causing the reexamination of the equivalence of services decision? Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Lind, Steven D, ALABS > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:53 AM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Minutes of W3C WSDWG Conference Call, June 26th, 2003 > > > <<minutes-20030626.html>> > The minutes of today's (2003-06-26) conference call are attached. > > Respectfully submitted, > > Steve Lind > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------ > Steven D. Lind Tel: 973-236-6787 > 180 Park Avenue, Bldg. 2 Fax: 973-236-6453 > Room 2G25 sdlind@att.com > Florham Park, NJ 07932 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------ > >
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 15:06:56 UTC