- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 15:08:47 -0700
- To: "'Jonathan Marsh'" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 18:08:55 UTC
I understand, thanks for the clarification, and hope I haven't taken too much extra time by being confused. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:04 PM > To: David Orchard; www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: RE: Minutes of W3C WSDWG Conference Call, June 26th, 2003 > > > > David wrote: > > Gotcha, sorry for my confusion. I was asking about > > "<sanjiva> JM point 1: anyone against removing @targetResource > > <sdl-scribe> no one on call seems to object". > > No one on the call objected. Some pointed out that others not on the > call were likely to object. And some thought that we first needed to > revisit the single-interface-per-service decision before deciding it. > So we didn't actually get a resolution although we were close > :-). It's > hard to take full and accurate minutes on a fast-paced and varied > discussion like we had today. > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 18:08:55 UTC