W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Minutes of W3C WSDWG Conference Call, June 26th, 2003

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:10:04 +0200
Message-ID: <3EFC422C.4070306@crf.canon.fr>
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org

Does this apply to section 1.1 too (i.e. no conclusion reached, so keep 
the figure and text)?

BTW, I have a correction for the minutes: I indicated during the call 
that, if we were to drop the figures, we should keep revert to the 
previous version of the text and not simply drop the text alltogether. 
The current text is a revamp of earlier text, which was existed long 
before the Rennes F2F.


Jonathan Marsh wrote:

> David wrote:
>>Gotcha, sorry for my confusion.  I was asking about
>>"<sanjiva> JM point 1: anyone against removing @targetResource
>><sdl-scribe> no one on call seems to object".
> No one on the call objected.  Some pointed out that others not on the
> call were likely to object.  And some thought that we first needed to
> revisit the single-interface-per-service decision before deciding it.
> So we didn't actually get a resolution although we were close :-).  It's
> hard to take full and accurate minutes on a fast-paced and varied
> discussion like we had today.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 09:10:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:30 UTC