Re: Agenda, 26 June 2003 WS Desc telcon - regret

Regrets from me too, for the same reason as Kevin.

Roberto


Liu, Kevin wrote:
> I will not be able to call in due to conflict with the WS-I plenary 
> 
> Best Regards, 
> Kevin 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:46 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Agenda, 26 June 2003 WS Desc telcon
> 
> 
> 0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
> 
> See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
> information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
> 
> If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
> before the start of the telcon.
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003Jun/0035.html
> [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Agenda
> 
> 1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
>       Don Mullen (fallbacks: Adi Sakala, Steve Lind, Sandeep Kumar, 
>       Dale Moberg, Prasad Yendluri, Jacek Kopecky, 
>       Dietmar Gaertner, Jerry Thrasher, Allen Brooks, Glen Daniels)
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2.  Approval of minutes:
>   - June 19 telcon [.1].
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0066.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3.  Review of Action items [.1].
> ?         2003-03-13: Don will write a proposal for annotating schema
>                       with part information.
> ?         2003-03-27: Philippe write up a proposal for embedding binary
>                       data types in schema
> ?         2003-05-13: DaveO to send a motivating example for R131.
> ?         2003-05-13: Jeffsch, Sanjiva, Glen, Umit, JJM to come up with
>                       a proposal to get rid with the message construct,
>                       and add programming hints.
> ?         2003-05-14: Kevin to contact Sanjiva and try to merge 
>                       proposals.
> ?         2003-06-12: Jacek to synthesize the different approaches 
>                       to solving issue 64.
> DONE [.2] 2003-06-12: Arthur to summarize his concerns about Umit's
>                       proposal by email. 
> ?         2003-06-19: Roberto to rewrite up an email about the whether
>                       to use "xs:any" or substitution groups, or both,
>                       for our extensibility mechanism.
> DONE [.3] 2003-06-19: Igor to write up about pros and cons of the 
>                       single service proposal.
> DONE [.3] 2003-06-19: Igor to come up with a new diagram.
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0142.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0127.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4.  Administrivia
>   a. July FTF logistics [.1], registration [.2]
>   b. 16 May 2003: The Web Services Task Force [.3] of the
>      Internationalization Working Group has released an updated Working
>      Draft of Web Services Internationalization Usage Scenarios [.2].
> The
>      document examines how language, culture, and related issues
> interact
>      with Web services architecture and technology. 
>   c. XPath, XQuery, XSLT Last Call document review [.5].
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/3/05/f2fJulyLogistics.htm
> [.2]
> http://cgi.w3.org/Register/selectUser.pl?_w3c_meetingName=WSAWG_WSDWG_20
> 0307
> [.3] http://www.w3.org/International/ws/
> [.4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-ws-i18n-scenarios-20030516/
> [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0082.html
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 5.  Task Force Status.
>  a. Properties and Features (dormant)
>  b. Patterns
>  c. Attributes
>  d. QA & Testing
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 6.  New Issues.  Merged issues list [.1].
>   - Error in diagram (David) [.2].  Jacek's additional (?) problem [.3].
> 
> [.1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html 
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0064.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0117.html
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7.  Substitution groups or <xs:any> extensibility [.1].
>     Awaiting alternatives from Roberto.
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0051.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8.  Single service per interface motivation [.1, .2]
>     Comments on the pretty pictures [.3].  Simplification of the
>     simplification proposal [.4].
> 
>     I perceive some agreement on the conceptual model (as indicated 
>     by the diagram).  Perhaps a straw poll on whether we should 
>     develop an alternative syntax/terminology proposal?
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0095.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0104.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0023.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0031.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 9.  R085 Describing endpoint references.  [.1]
>   - General agreement to add such capability to WSDL, but
>     not agreement on the precise form of the annotations and
>     where in the WSDL they should reside. Proposal 
>     from Umit [.3], response from Arthur [.4].
>   - Related issue (?) dynamic discovery of a service [.2].
> 
> [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/att-0088/R085-20
> 03-04-22.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0004.html
> [.3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/att-0024/umit_pr
> oposal.html__charset_ISO-8859-1
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0142.html
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 10. Issue 64 [.1] Operations an HTTP verbs (Mark Baker) [.2, .3, .4]
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x64 
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0094.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0103.html
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0111.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 11. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [.1].
>   - Arthur's proposal to unify property URIs and QName URIs. [.2]
>     Alternatives include using property markup, or a QNamed 
>     attribute.
>   - Proposal for advertising QoS features of a Web service in WSDL [.3].
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2 
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0047.html
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0020.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 12. Binding enhancements
>     Sanjiva proposes [.1] to:
>       1) Drop @interface from binding, since now in service. 
>       2) Allow inlining interface-wide binding within a port and 
>          making binding optional. 
>       3) Define default binding (SOAP doc/lit).  
>       4) Dealing with operation specific SOAPActions.
>     Kevin proposes to [.2]:
>       1) Allow reuse of parts of bindings through a BindingDetails
>          element and corresponding references.
>     Waiting for Kevin and Sanjiva to consolidate the proposals.
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0046.html
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0068.html
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 13. Removing message.
>     Investigating idea to cleanly separate interop at the message 
>     format level from interop at the programming model level. Awaiting
>     proposal from Jeffsch et. al. to get rid with the message 
>     construct, and add programming hints.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 14. Moving MIME Type Information to the Interface [.1]
>     Awaiting proposal from Philippe.
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0028.html 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> 15. Using RDF in WSDL [.1].
>     Dependent upon RDF mapping first draft.
> 
> [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0076.html
>

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 09:23:05 UTC