- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 17:26:04 +0200
- To: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
You've just found a bug. What I was really trying to say was that the service provides a mean for accessing (manipulating?) a resource. I think that's what we agreed in Rennes and that is captured in the fork diagram [3]. I think this aspect is missing from your proposed definition. What about the following revised wording instead? <revised> The targetResource attribute information item identifies the resource that can be manipulated through the service's interface. </revised> JJ. [3] <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~//2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?content-type=text/html#serviceresfig1> David Booth wrote: > > The current draft wording on targetResource[1] says: "The > targetResource attribute information item identifies the resource > that the service is a representation of." > > 1. This wording seems to be using the term "representation" in a way > that is different from the usage in the TAG's Web Architecture > document[2]. Wherever possible, I think we should be consistent with > the WebArch's use of terms. > > 2. This wording also seems unnecessarily restrictive. The > targetResource indicates a relationship between the WSDL service and > some other resource. Although one good use of it is to indicate > that two WSDL services operate on the same physical object (such as a > printer), it seems to me that: (a) the exact nature of the > relationship will always depend on the semantics of the particular > application or service that is defined; and (b) there may be other > legitimate uses that don't necessarily involve the same physical > object. For this reason I think we are best off saying as little as > possible about it in our spec. > > Accordingly, I propose changing the above wording to something like: > "The targetResource attribute information item identifies a resource > that is related to the service. The nature of the relationship > depends on the semantics of the service." > > Comments? > > 1. WSDL 1.2 draft: > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html#Service_resource_attribute > > > > 2. TAG Web Arch: http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#representations > >
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 11:26:34 UTC