RE: Can someone recap the differences between @serviceGroup vs. definitions-targetNamespace ?

Amy:

> > Can we just not go back to allowing mulitiple interfaces 
> per service 
> > and declare victory?
> 
> My eyes somehow edited out the word "not".  It made sense to 
> me, and seemed to be what you have argued earlier.  With the 
> word "not" in there ... where do we put the flag to proclaim 
> victory?  In targetResource? 
> In serviceGroup?  Somewhere else?  Mind, I'm opposed to most 
> all of that, 'cause I still think that it's just cleaner to 
> define service with multiple interfaces; I'd like us to 'just 
> go back to allowing multiple interfaces per service and 
> declare victory'.  Sorry to have misinterpreted; could you 
> clarify a bit where you want to stand while declaring 
> victory, since it's apparently not there in multiple interfaces?

I'll re-phrase it: Allow multiple interfaces per service.

Can I re-declare victory too? :-)

Jim