- From: Amy Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:15:11 -0400
- To: "Jim Webber" <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Hmm, it appears that I misread this, and now I'm not sure what was intended. Jim? On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:38:25 +0100 "Jim Webber" <jim.webber@arjuna.com> wrote: > Can we just not go back to allowing mulitiple interfaces per service > and declare victory? My eyes somehow edited out the word "not". It made sense to me, and seemed to be what you have argued earlier. With the word "not" in there ... where do we put the flag to proclaim victory? In targetResource? In serviceGroup? Somewhere else? Mind, I'm opposed to most all of that, 'cause I still think that it's just cleaner to define service with multiple interfaces; I'd like us to 'just go back to allowing multiple interfaces per service and declare victory'. Sorry to have misinterpreted; could you clarify a bit where you want to stand while declaring victory, since it's apparently not there in multiple interfaces? Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:14:08 UTC