- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:49:23 -0500
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:28:39AM -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > The three issues against this proposal noted in today's telcon are: > > 1) Is it good practice to extract part of your content to parameterize > your URI? IMO, no. > If not, what is the best way? Invoke GET on the URI to retrieve a document, and include in that a declaration of how the URI can be parameterized. This is what forms are for (well, "GET forms" anyhow); see XForms[1] or RDF Forms[2]. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/ [2] http://www.markbaker.ca/2003/05/RDF-Forms/ Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Friday, 19 December 2003 00:49:08 UTC