- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:08:40 -0500
- To: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Cc: WS Description List <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Good. +1 to all suggestions here. On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 10:52 AM, David Booth wrote: > Hi Amy, > > Your proposed text looks reasonable. I have a few editorial > suggestions though: > > At 01:01 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Amelia A Lewis wrote: >> . . . >> Proposed text: >> >> Multiple inclusion of a single WSDL document MUST be resolved to a > > Change: "MUST be resolved" to "resolves". > >> single set of components. Mutual, multiple, and circular includes are >> explicitly permitted, and do not represent multiple redefinitions of >> the >> same components. > > Insert: "Multiple inclusion of a single WSDL document has the same > meaning as including it only once." > >> Processors are encouraged to keep track of the source >> of component definitions, so that multiple, mutual, and circular >> includes do not require establishing identity component-by-component. > > It might be good to move the following to the beginning of the > paragraph, to avoid the forward reference: > >> A >> mutual include is direct inclusion by one WSDL document of another >> WSDL >> document which includes the first. A circular include achieves the >> same >> effect with greater indirection (WSDL A includes WSDL B includes WSDL >> A, >> for instance). > > -- > David Booth > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard > Telephone: +1.617.253.1273 >
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2003 14:04:52 UTC